Category: MEASUREMENT OF INTERACTION ENERGY
[NEW] Y. Cao, M.-W. Wong, J. Mol. Model. 2014, 20, 2136: Roles of electrostatic interaction and dispersion in CH···CH, CH···π, and π···π ethylene dimers.
C. Zhao et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 13, 4306–14309: Do Deuteriums Form Stronger CH-π Interactions?
W. R. Carroll et al., Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 4320-4323: A Molecular Balance for Measuring Aliphatic CH-pi Interactions.
R. Carrillo et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 7803-7808: Quantification of a CH/pi Interaction Responsible for Chiral Discrimination and Evaluation of Its Contribution to Enantioselectivity.
M. Kaufmann et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 3810-3813: Stable Cyclohexyl-Phenyl Recognition in the Center of a DNA Duplex.
J. P. Hill et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2009, 11, 6038- 6041: Evidence for a ball-shaped cyclen cyclophane: an experimental and first principles study.
L. Bautista-Ibniez et al., J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 849-857: Calorimetric measurement of the CH/pi interaction involved in the molecular recognition of saccharides by aromatic compounds.
J. C. Morales et al., Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 7828-7835: Experimental Measurement of Carbohydrate-Aromatic Stacking in Water by Using a Dangling-Ended DNA Model System.
C. S. Wilcox et al., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 6833-6836: A Minimal protein folding model to measure hydrophobic and CH-pi effects on interactions between nonpolar surfaces in water.
F. Carver et al., Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 2848-2859: Substituent effects on edge-to-face aromatic interactions.
G. Arena et al., Supramol. Chem. 2001, 13, 379-386: Energetics of the inclusion of organic molecules by rigidified cone calix[4]arenes in carbon tetrachloride.
R. Caciuffo et al., Phys. Rev. B 1999, 60, 11867-11870: Measurements of host-guest interaction energies in a calixarene supramolecular complex.
E.-I. Kim et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11192-11193: Measurements of molecular electrostatic field effects in edge-to-face aromatic interactions and CH-pi interactions with implications for protein folding and molecular recognition.
F. J. Carver et al., Chem. Commun. 1998, 775-776: Structure-activity relationship for quantifying aromatic interactions.
D. R. Boyd et al., Chem. Commun. 1996, 2269-2270: Edge-to-face aromatic interaction in alkenes, nitrones and imines.
H. Adams et al., Angew. Chem., Intern. Ed. 1996, 1542-1544: Chemical double-mutant cycles for the measurement of weak intermolecular interactions: Edge-to-face aromatic interactions.
F. Cozzi, J. S. Siegel, Pure, Appl., Chem. 1995, 67, 683-689: Interaction between stacked aryl groups in 1,8-diarylnaphthalenes: Dominance of polar/pi over charge-transfer effects.
S. Paliwal et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 4497-4498: Molecular torsion balance for weak molecular recognition forces. Effects of "tilted-T" edge-to-face aromatic interactions on conformational selection and solid-state structure.
R. Ehama et al., Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1993, 66, 814-818: Substituent effect on the enthalpies of formation of CH-pi complexes of aromatic pi-bases.